US Ban on TP-Link Routers Imminent Over China Ties and Cyber-Espionage Fears
U.S. authorities are reportedly preparing to ban the sale of routers and other network equipment manufactured by TP-Link Systems. According to multiple sources, the initiative is driven less by technical vulnerabilities and more by suspected ties between the company and China. Yet experts point out that nearly the entire industry sources components from the PRC — and that many consumer routers arrive “out of the box” with insecure default configurations.
As reported by The Washington Post, several federal agencies have endorsed the proposal to restrict TP-Link products from entering the American market. The U.S. Department of Commerce has determined that the company’s devices pose a potential risk because they handle sensitive user data and could be subject to influence from Chinese authorities.
TP-Link has denied these allegations, stating that over the past three years it has fully separated its U.S. subsidiary, TP-Link Systems, from the Chinese parent company, TP-Link Technologies. Company representatives emphasized that TP-Link’s U.S. market share does not exceed 30%, that its headquarters is located in California, and that parts of its production have been relocated to Vietnam. However, former NSA official Rob Joyce estimates that TP-Link’s actual market share could reach 60%, partly due to aggressive price dumping and the sale of hardware below cost. TP-Link maintains that it conducts its own research, design, and assembly, relying on external suppliers only for microchips.
The U.S. division retains ownership of its engineering and manufacturing assets in China but insists that these facilities operate autonomously, without direction from the Chinese government. Company spokesperson Rikka Silverio underscored that TP-Link poses no threat to U.S. national security, portraying the firm as a trusted provider of affordable networking solutions for the American market.
TP-Link’s enduring popularity stems largely from its low prices paired with respectable performance. The brand’s routers are notably cheaper than comparable devices, making them especially attractive to internet service providers that deploy them en masse for customers. However, in the summer of 2024, members of Congress called for an investigation after reports surfaced that TP-Link routers were used even on military bases and sold in stores for service members.
In a letter to the Department of Commerce, lawmakers warned that the combination of exploitable vulnerabilities and the legal obligation of Chinese companies to comply with state directives raises serious concerns. They reminded officials that Chinese cyber groups have repeatedly leveraged consumer and office routers — including TP-Link models — in attacks against American networks.
To substantiate their concerns, lawmakers cited a Check Point Research report from May 2023, which detailed the activities of Camaro Dragon, a cyber-espionage group linked to Chinese intelligence. Researchers discovered malicious firmware embedded in several TP-Link models, used in targeted attacks against European diplomatic missions. Check Point noted that the malicious components were modular and adaptable, meaning they could have been implanted in devices from other manufacturers as well.
In October 2024, Microsoft also reported a long-running campaign in which multiple Chinese hacker groups used compromised TP-Link routers to attack corporate Microsoft accounts. The attackers conducted password-spraying operations, attempting to gain access by testing common password combinations at scale.
TP-Link, for its part, argues that it is far from unique — virtually every major network hardware vendor, including Cisco and Netgear, has faced similar exploitation of its vulnerabilities by foreign threat actors. Nonetheless, this does little to reassure users who fear their devices could still be at risk, regardless of brand.
The root of the problem, experts note, lies not in national affiliation but in systemic insecurity. Most consumer routers ship with weak default credentials, outdated firmware, and open services that can make them targets for botnets within minutes of being connected to the internet.
For years, manufacturers largely ignored these issues, shifting the burden of responsibility onto users. But the situation has begun to improve: newer generations of routers now require users to change default passwords and update firmware during initial setup. Modern mesh systems like Eero, Orbi, and ZenWiFi enforce online registration and automatically install security updates.
Even budget-friendly models from Belkin and Linksys now offer streamlined mobile setup tools. While these improvements make life easier for casual users, they also restrict manual configuration and advanced customization, leaving some room for potential vulnerabilities.
Power users still have another option — installing alternative open-source firmware such as OpenWrt or DD-WRT. These systems, compatible with many router models, enable features like VPN configuration, ad blocking, traffic monitoring, and other advanced capabilities unavailable in stock firmware. They also extend the lifespan of older devices, though they require manual updates and basic technical know-how.
Concerned TP-Link owners may find this to be a viable path forward: many TP-Link models are fully compatible with OpenWrt, which can eliminate common firmware vulnerabilities such as hardcoded accounts or authentication flaws — though it cannot mitigate potential hardware-level risks.
That said, users should never modify routers provided by their internet service provider, as such devices often have operator-specific profiles and are centrally managed. Unauthorized alterations can disrupt connectivity entirely.
Ultimately, if the proposed TP-Link ban is enacted, it will undoubtedly disrupt the U.S. market for low-cost networking equipment. Yet the issue runs far deeper — raising the larger question of whether true cybersecurity is possible in an industry where nearly every supply chain still runs through China.
Support Our Threat Intelligence
If you find our technology report and cybersecurity news helpful, consider supporting our work.