The performance and speed of the processor increased significantly Exynos 2200
Since Samsung announced at the beginning of this year that the mobile GPU cooperating with AMD will be used in the next flagship product, the new generation of Exynos 2200 has attracted much attention. Its GPU codenamed Voyager, adopts mRDNA architecture, integrates 6 CUs with a total of 384 stream processors, supports ray tracing and variable-rate shading, and clears Samsung SoC’s long-standing shortcomings.
It was previously rumored that in the 3DMark Wild Life test, the new chip easily beat Samsung Exynos 2100, Qualcomm Snapdragon 888, and Apple’s A14 bionic, which is higher than any current device running Android system and only lower than the device based on the M1 chip. However, as the time for the disclosure of Exynos 2200 related information has been delayed, the situation seems to be less optimistic.
In the past few months, it was first reported that Exynos 2200 had encountered setbacks in manufacturing using Samsung’s 4nm LPE process, then it was reported that the chip had power consumption problems, which was higher than expected. Samsung sought a solution to balance between performance and power consumption, and tested chips with different configurations. Then it was reported that Samsung increased the purchase of Qualcomm Snapdragon chips, replacing the originally planned Exynos 2200 on the Galaxy S22 series in some regions, and even canceling the Exynos 2200. To make matters worse, there has been almost no news of Exynos 2200 recently.
Recently, according to Twitter user @AhmedQwaider888, Exynos 2200 may not be so good. The CPU performance has increased by only 5%, and the GPU performance has increased by 17%, which is lower than the previous leaked results. However, it is rumored that Exynos 2200 will be equipped with NPU, and AI performance will be improved by 117%, which will be the more advanced aspect of new products.
According to Samsung’s plan, consumers should see this chip on the Galaxy S22 series, and the final performance will naturally have an answer.
